|
|
|
|
| |
 |
Peer Review Process |
 |
|
| | Post date: 2019/10/7 | |
|
The Journal of peer review process
In the Journal of Crop Physiology, each article is reviewed by 2 to 3 experts on the subject. The process of reviewing articles is confidential and the name of the reviewers is unknown for the author(s) and vice versa.
Referees enter the review process system after receiving the article link (via email, directly or through the journal website) by using their username and password.
For online reviewing do according the following comments:
¢ After logging into the journal system and opening the personal page, click on the referee icon and then new articles.
¢ In this case, the submitted article will be visible for the reviewer, and then by clicking on the article code who can select accept or reject the reviewing process.
¢ After accepted by clicking on the article code paper will be available (a direct link will be sent to the email simultaneously).
The following options are visible in the reviewing page:
Related files: Download original article file.
Article evaluation form: After reviewing the article, the overall opinion of the referee will be recorded in this section and comments should be added if necessary.
Description of referee for editor/author(s): After reviewing process referees add comments (if required) in the dialogue box (Markup).
File Submission: If you submit comments and refereeing suggestions in the original file of the article, you will need to upload and submit the new file in this section.
Final Referee viewpoint: One of the acceptable options, overall review, partial review, I cannot review, is selected and then click on option “send reviewing result for editor”.
Point 1: The referee should be kept all information in the articles confidential.
Point 2: It is essential that respect referees avoid accepting the review of articles that are of beneficiaries in them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
